Skip to content

Data analysis

Turn your marketing data into actionable decisions.

Accumulating data is not enough: you need a framework to decide. We make measurement reliable, reconcile sources, and set up the routine that turns a number into a call.

Direct answer

How does a marketing metric become a decision?

By following a short chain: a management question, a shared definition of what is counted, a checked measurement, a trigger threshold, and an owner who decides by a known date. When one link is missing, the dashboard may keep displaying numbers while decision quality weakens.

Important considerationPerfect attribution does not exist. Between consent, multiple devices and long cycles, part of the conversions stays approximate: we make that imprecision explicit rather than hide it.

The problem

A dashboard without governance solves nothing.

An extra dashboard does not create a decision. Without a defined moment where someone looks at the numbers, decides and owns the call, the tool becomes a report nobody opens.

There is also a limit to accept: perfect attribution does not exist. Between consent, multiple devices and long journeys, part of conversions will stay approximate. The point is to decide despite that imprecision, while knowing it.

The decision spine

From a management question down to an arbitration.

01Management question
What leadership needs to decide: allocate, stop, hire, revise a price.
02Definition
What counts as a lead, an opportunity, a customer — one definition, shared by marketing and sales.
03Measurement
Events, sources, duplicates, losses, consent-collection compliance.
04Confidence level
What is established, what remains a hypothesis, and the blind spot of the chosen attribution model.
05Threshold
The gap that triggers action, set before observation to avoid convenient reading.
06Decision
A written, dated arbitration, with its author and a review date.

Example framework used during the engagement. It is adapted to your context, data and decisions.

Approach

From measurement to decision.

  • Measurement plan

    Start from the decisions to be made, then derive the indicators — not the other way round.

  • Tracking quality

    Checks on events, duplicates, losses, consent-collection compliance.

  • Source reconciliation

    Web, advertising, CRM and sales data reconciled against a shared lead definition.

  • Dashboard

    One view per use: leadership, marketing, sales. Few indicators, all actionable.

  • Attribution hypotheses

    Models made explicit and treated as hypotheses, with their blind spots.

  • Decision routine

    A recurring meeting, a set agenda, decisions logged and reviewed at the next cycle.

Honest reading

An imprecise, known figure beats a false, reassuring one.

We indicate the confidence level attached to each finding and separate what is established from what remains a reading hypothesis.

That means accepting grey areas — the condition for arbitrations to stay defensible months after they are made.

What we refuse
Presenting an attribution model as a measured truth.
What we provide
The blind spots of the chosen model, written next to the figure.

Deliverables

What is produced.

  • Audit of existing measurement and identified gaps.
  • Documented measurement plan: events, definitions, responsibilities.
  • Tracking fixes specified for implementation with your teams.
  • Operational dashboard within your tools.
  • Periodic decision-oriented analysis notes.
  • Routine framework: frequency, participants, reporting format.

Read next

Related pages in English.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Do we need to change tools?

Not necessarily. We first assess whether the existing stack can support the required decisions; a change is proposed only when a documented technical limit blocks them.

Our data is incomplete, is that a blocker?

No. We indicate the confidence level attached to each finding and separate what is established from what remains a hypothesis. Deciding with explicit uncertainty beats waiting for perfect data.

Who implements the tracking fixes?

We specify exactly the events and parameters expected. Implementation is done by your developers or by us if the scope provides for it in the proposal.

Do you build the dashboard?

Yes, in a tool your teams can open independently. The goal is a small number of indicators tied to identified decisions, not a library of charts.

Which attribution model do you recommend?

The one that fits your buying cycle, keeping in mind no model reflects the full reality. We compare several readings and keep the one that produces the most stable calls.

Will we be autonomous at the end?

That is the goal: documentation, dashboard hand-off and facilitation of the decision routine. Ongoing support can continue if you want to keep an external perspective.

Next step

Let's start by checking what your numbers actually measure.

A framing session helps identify the measurement gaps currently distorting your calls.